Placing blame for runaway healthcare costs solely on physicians is simply an attempt to divert attention from the real perpetrators. In his recent Time magazine feature story, Steven Brill painstakingly outlined how hospitals throughout the country are generating obscene charges and profits. Over 30% of healthcare spending is generated by hospitals, a large share of which goes to managers and executives; many taking home seven figure salaries. Ignoring this, the Patient Payment Reform Commission wants to give the hospital administrators, through the new ACO model, even more control by directing payments to them, effectively making them the gatekeepers of reimbursements. The false narrative that has been created for public consumption is that in doing so, savings are created by consolidating and delivering care more efficiently and effectively. So far this is simply false.
Read More
Blog and News
"Docs4PatientCare.org is a politically neutral grassroots coalition of physicians. Use of any politically partisan terms does not reflect the position of Docs4PatientCare.org. We do encourage our speakers to express how they feel and we post articles based on their informative content only. Any politically partisan language used does not reflect the group as a whole. Specific party or political allegiances and opposition are not our intent. The goal of D4PC is only to advocate for effective and responsible health care reform."
Why Pay Physicians Anything At All For Providing Healthcare? TownHall.org
Monday, March 18, 2013
A John Galt Speech For Direct Pay Practitioners, The Covert Rationing Blog
Sunday, September 16, 2012
Long time readers of this blog will know that I am a strong proponent of direct-pay practitioners, of doctors who “drop out” of the system to establish medical practices in which they are paid directly by their patients. This kind of arrangement is the only way today for physicians and patients to enjoy the classic doctor-patient relationship; you know, the relationship where the patient agrees to confide completely in the physician, and the physician agrees to work solely for the benefit of the patient.
In the modern healthcare system, especially under Obamacare, this classic form of the doctor-patient relationship is not only frowned upon, but is considered unethical. It is unethical because doctors have formally adopted a “new ethics” which obligates them to work for “social justice,” which is a pleasant-sounding euphemism for covert bedside healthcare rationing. The direct-pay model allows physicians to avoid this odious new responsibility.
The entire healthcare system today is disposed to hate the direct-pay model. The reason typically given is that this model of practice will establish unfair “two-tiered” healthcare, the new, undesired tier, of course, being the one in which patients would enjoy the benefits of a professional advocate who is looking out for their individual needs.
Read More
Is Fee-For-Service The Problem? National Center For Policy Analysis
Sunday, April 22, 2012
Almost everyone involved in health care will tell you that the greatest problem in our system is that we pay on a "fee-for-service" basis. Almost everyone is wrong. Fee for service is not the problem, but FFS in a third party payor system. Only in health care is there someone else picking up the tab for our spending.
If we applied the same third-party payment technique to any other segment of the economy we would get the exact same inflationary spiral we see in health care.
Read More
1
Recent Posts
- The Oregon Trial - WSJ
- A Temporary Insurance Program Foretells Exploding Obamacare Costs, Forbes
- Is Your Doctor Really A Doctor? TownHall.com
- Health Insurers Warn On Premiums, The Wall Street Journal
- Why Pay Physicians Anything At All For Providing Healthcare? TownHall.org
- To Save, Workers Take On Health-Cost Risk, The Wall Street Journal
- The Doctor Won't See You Now. He's Clocked Out, The Wall Street Journal
- Connecting The Dots On Healthcare, TownHall.com
- D4PC Endorsed Patients' Compensation System Introduced In Florida Legislature, HeraldOnLine.com
- Anti-Obesity Programs Fatten Government, Investors Business Daily
Tags
- 10th Amendment (3)
- AARP (2)
- accountable care (11)
- ACO (24)
- alternative HCR proposals (27)
- Alternative Health Care Proposals (14)
- AMA (10)
- awards (4)
- Berwick (2)
- Beth Haynes (4)
- Book Reviews (2)
- bribes (14)
- British healthcare system (6)
- budget deficits (19)
- bureacracy (18)
- Bureaucracy (7)
- CLASS (2)
- clips (3)
- Collapse Insurance Market (2)
- Colorado (1)
- commerce clause (2)
- Compact (1)
- comparative effectiveness research (10)
- concierge medicine (2)
- Conscience Clause (3)
- constitutionality (53)
- Contraception Mandate (1)
- Cost Miscalculations (12)
- cost shifting (10)
- costs (27)
- cost-shifting (1)
- court challenges (31)
- D4PC Events (1)
- D4PC opinion (7)
- deals (15)
- decreased quality (17)
- defensive medicine (3)
- Dick Armstrong (3)
- diminished physician autonomy (25)
- Direct Pay Practice Model (1)
- Dispelling Healthcare Myths (6)
- Donald Berwick (8)
- Electronic Medical Record (7)
- Elena Kagan (5)
- Elena Kagen (3)
- entitltement growth (6)
- Evidence-based Medicine (2)
- Exchanges (23)
- expensive business mandates (4)
- Expensive Mandates (11)
- Failed Promises (7)
- Favors/Special Interest Groups (10)
- feature (1)
- Fee For Service (3)
- Foreign health systems (21)
- Frank Rosenbloom (1)
- free market (15)
- free-market healthcare (25)
- generic medications (4)
- Government Coercion (2)
- government intrusion (31)
- government run healthcare (40)
- Grace-Marie Turner (12)
- Hal Scherz (39)
- Health IT, Obamacare (8)
- healthcare access issues (5)
- Healthcare cost-drivers (10)
- Healthcare Myths (2)
- Heritage Foundation (7)
- HHS (9)
- Hidden Costs (11)
- High deductible insurance plans (4)
- HMO (1)
- Hospital Readmission Penalty (1)
- House budget (1)
- HSAs (13)
- ICD-10 (1)
- impact on business (27)
- Impact on Consumers (15)
- Impact on Deficit/Debt (10)
- impact on doctors (39)
- impact on economy (21)
- impact on hospitals (9)
- Impact on Jobs (10)
- impact on patients (64)
- impact on seniors (23)
- Impact on Small Business (10)
- Impact On States (1)
- impact on the economy (12)
- impact on the economy, socialized medicine (2)
- Impact on Women (4)
- Impact on Young Adults/Kids (7)
- increased taxes (19)
- increased waiting times (7)
- Independent Payment Advisory Board (25)
- individual mandate (25)
- innovation and technology (10)
- insurance premiums (33)
- insurance subsidies (16)
- IPAB (12)
- IRS (4)
- Jeff English, MD (1)
- Jill Vecchio (7)
- malpractice reform (9)
- Marci Cook (1)
- Mark Neerhof (3)
- Massachusetts model (10)
- Matt McCord (1)
- Mayo Clinic (1)
- media bias (4)
- Medicaid (35)
- Medicaid Expansion (19)
- Medical Device tax (1)
- Medical Liability Reform (1)
- medical loss ratio (2)
- medicare (55)
- Medicare Advantage (2)
- Medicare Reform (1)
- Medicare SGR (1)
- Michigan (3)
- Misinformation (3)
- Mitch McConnell (1)
- Mitt Romney (9)
- Morning Rounds (83)
- Nullification (1)
- Obamacare (23)
- op-eds (6)
- patient freedom of choice (22)
- patient outcomes (3)
- Patient Privacy (12)
- patient-centered reforms (14)
- Paul Hsieh (6)
- Paul Ryan (12)
- Physician Employment (4)
- physician shortage (10)
- Physician-Owned Hospitals (1)
- polling (9)
- PPACA (35)
- PPACA repeal (2)
- Pre-Existing Conditions (3)
- Premium Increases (11)
- premium support (3)
- press releases (1)
- price controls (7)
- private insurance (3)
- private practice (6)
- Propaganda (6)
- rationing (25)
- Reforming Medicare (3)
- regulatory burden (13)
- repeal (6)
- Romney health plan (8)
- Romney/Ryan Medicare Plan (1)
- Ryan plan (7)
- Sally Pipes (7)
- Scope of Practice Expansion (4)
- Sebelius (10)
- Single-Payer System (1)
- small business tax credit (1)
- socialized medicine (7)
- special deals (2)
- Special Interests/Lobbyists (3)
- Spending (3)
- state budget deficits (14)
- state budgets (6)
- state insurance exchanges (24)
- state models (7)
- State of the Union (1)
- state opt out (10)
- Supreme Court (17)
- tax credits (5)
- Tax Reform (4)
- Taxes (8)
- Tenth Amendment (2)
- Testimony (2)
- Tod Rubin (1)
- tort reform (4)
- unintended consequences (22)
- union payoffs (6)
- US Senate and Repeal (1)
- USA health rankings (4)
- Vermont (2)
- video (3)
- Virginia (1)
- waivers (16)
- War On Women (2)
- Washington D.C. (11)
- WH deception (6)
- WH propaganda (3)
- WHite House Deception (31)
- White House propaganda (27)
- Women's Health (6)
Archive
D4PC provides links to other Internet sites only for the convenience of web users. D4PC is not responsible for the availability or content of these external sites, nor does the D4PC endorse, warrant or guarantee the products, services or information described or offered at these other Internet sites.