A new article at Forbes.com explains why "closing Medicare's 'donut hole' is a terrible idea." Avik Roy explains that the very existence of the donut hole came about as an important cost-saving measure in Medicare's prescription drug program (known as "Part D").
Read More
Blog and News
"Docs4PatientCare.org is a politically neutral grassroots coalition of physicians. Use of any politically partisan terms does not reflect the position of Docs4PatientCare.org. We do encourage our speakers to express how they feel and we post articles based on their informative content only. Any politically partisan language used does not reflect the group as a whole. Specific party or political allegiances and opposition are not our intent. The goal of D4PC is only to advocate for effective and responsible health care reform."
"Closing Medicare's 'Donut Hole' is a Terrible Idea"
Thursday, May 24, 2012
It's Not Just The Mandates: Obamacare's Other Infringements, PJ Media
Friday, March 30, 2012
“Unexpected” cost overruns are nothing new for government programs. When Medicare was passed in 1965, it was predicted the program would "only" cost $12 billion by 1990 (it actually cost a whopping $110 billion per year by 1990, nearly 10 times more than predicted).
The rapidly rising costs of ObamaCare will likely far outpace the amount by which Medicare exceeded its original cost estimates. But the soaring economic costs of ObamaCare will pale in comparison to the escalating losses of freedom.
The infringement of personal freedom receiving the most attention lately has been the “individual mandate” which requires Americans to purchase health insurance. This issue is at the heart of the current legal challenge before the U.S. Supreme Court. Lost in the debate, however, is the fact that ObamaCare also poses numerous other mandates, controls and burdens on patients, their doctors and employers. Read more about these burdens in an article from D4PC's Dr. Paul Hsieh, here.
Read More
The rapidly rising costs of ObamaCare will likely far outpace the amount by which Medicare exceeded its original cost estimates. But the soaring economic costs of ObamaCare will pale in comparison to the escalating losses of freedom.
The infringement of personal freedom receiving the most attention lately has been the “individual mandate” which requires Americans to purchase health insurance. This issue is at the heart of the current legal challenge before the U.S. Supreme Court. Lost in the debate, however, is the fact that ObamaCare also poses numerous other mandates, controls and burdens on patients, their doctors and employers. Read more about these burdens in an article from D4PC's Dr. Paul Hsieh, here.
Read More
1
Recent Posts
- The Oregon Trial - WSJ
- A Temporary Insurance Program Foretells Exploding Obamacare Costs, Forbes
- Is Your Doctor Really A Doctor? TownHall.com
- Health Insurers Warn On Premiums, The Wall Street Journal
- Why Pay Physicians Anything At All For Providing Healthcare? TownHall.org
- To Save, Workers Take On Health-Cost Risk, The Wall Street Journal
- The Doctor Won't See You Now. He's Clocked Out, The Wall Street Journal
- Connecting The Dots On Healthcare, TownHall.com
- D4PC Endorsed Patients' Compensation System Introduced In Florida Legislature, HeraldOnLine.com
- Anti-Obesity Programs Fatten Government, Investors Business Daily
Tags
- 10th Amendment (3)
- AARP (2)
- accountable care (11)
- ACO (24)
- alternative HCR proposals (27)
- Alternative Health Care Proposals (14)
- AMA (10)
- awards (4)
- Berwick (2)
- Beth Haynes (4)
- Book Reviews (2)
- bribes (14)
- British healthcare system (6)
- budget deficits (19)
- bureacracy (18)
- Bureaucracy (7)
- CLASS (2)
- clips (3)
- Collapse Insurance Market (2)
- Colorado (1)
- commerce clause (2)
- Compact (1)
- comparative effectiveness research (10)
- concierge medicine (2)
- Conscience Clause (3)
- constitutionality (53)
- Contraception Mandate (1)
- Cost Miscalculations (12)
- cost shifting (10)
- costs (27)
- cost-shifting (1)
- court challenges (31)
- D4PC Events (1)
- D4PC opinion (7)
- deals (15)
- decreased quality (17)
- defensive medicine (3)
- Dick Armstrong (3)
- diminished physician autonomy (25)
- Direct Pay Practice Model (1)
- Dispelling Healthcare Myths (6)
- Donald Berwick (8)
- Electronic Medical Record (7)
- Elena Kagan (5)
- Elena Kagen (3)
- entitltement growth (6)
- Evidence-based Medicine (2)
- Exchanges (23)
- expensive business mandates (4)
- Expensive Mandates (11)
- Failed Promises (7)
- Favors/Special Interest Groups (10)
- feature (1)
- Fee For Service (3)
- Foreign health systems (21)
- Frank Rosenbloom (1)
- free market (15)
- free-market healthcare (25)
- generic medications (4)
- Government Coercion (2)
- government intrusion (31)
- government run healthcare (40)
- Grace-Marie Turner (12)
- Hal Scherz (39)
- Health IT, Obamacare (8)
- healthcare access issues (5)
- Healthcare cost-drivers (10)
- Healthcare Myths (2)
- Heritage Foundation (7)
- HHS (9)
- Hidden Costs (11)
- High deductible insurance plans (4)
- HMO (1)
- Hospital Readmission Penalty (1)
- House budget (1)
- HSAs (13)
- ICD-10 (1)
- impact on business (27)
- Impact on Consumers (15)
- Impact on Deficit/Debt (10)
- impact on doctors (39)
- impact on economy (21)
- impact on hospitals (9)
- Impact on Jobs (10)
- impact on patients (64)
- impact on seniors (23)
- Impact on Small Business (10)
- Impact On States (1)
- impact on the economy (12)
- impact on the economy, socialized medicine (2)
- Impact on Women (4)
- Impact on Young Adults/Kids (7)
- increased taxes (19)
- increased waiting times (7)
- Independent Payment Advisory Board (25)
- individual mandate (25)
- innovation and technology (10)
- insurance premiums (33)
- insurance subsidies (16)
- IPAB (12)
- IRS (4)
- Jeff English, MD (1)
- Jill Vecchio (7)
- malpractice reform (9)
- Marci Cook (1)
- Mark Neerhof (3)
- Massachusetts model (10)
- Matt McCord (1)
- Mayo Clinic (1)
- media bias (4)
- Medicaid (35)
- Medicaid Expansion (19)
- Medical Device tax (1)
- Medical Liability Reform (1)
- medical loss ratio (2)
- medicare (55)
- Medicare Advantage (2)
- Medicare Reform (1)
- Medicare SGR (1)
- Michigan (3)
- Misinformation (3)
- Mitch McConnell (1)
- Mitt Romney (9)
- Morning Rounds (83)
- Nullification (1)
- Obamacare (23)
- op-eds (6)
- patient freedom of choice (22)
- patient outcomes (3)
- Patient Privacy (12)
- patient-centered reforms (14)
- Paul Hsieh (6)
- Paul Ryan (12)
- Physician Employment (4)
- physician shortage (10)
- Physician-Owned Hospitals (1)
- polling (9)
- PPACA (35)
- PPACA repeal (2)
- Pre-Existing Conditions (3)
- Premium Increases (11)
- premium support (3)
- press releases (1)
- price controls (7)
- private insurance (3)
- private practice (6)
- Propaganda (6)
- rationing (25)
- Reforming Medicare (3)
- regulatory burden (13)
- repeal (6)
- Romney health plan (8)
- Romney/Ryan Medicare Plan (1)
- Ryan plan (7)
- Sally Pipes (7)
- Scope of Practice Expansion (4)
- Sebelius (10)
- Single-Payer System (1)
- small business tax credit (1)
- socialized medicine (7)
- special deals (2)
- Special Interests/Lobbyists (3)
- Spending (3)
- state budget deficits (14)
- state budgets (6)
- state insurance exchanges (24)
- state models (7)
- State of the Union (1)
- state opt out (10)
- Supreme Court (17)
- tax credits (5)
- Tax Reform (4)
- Taxes (8)
- Tenth Amendment (2)
- Testimony (2)
- Tod Rubin (1)
- tort reform (4)
- unintended consequences (22)
- union payoffs (6)
- US Senate and Repeal (1)
- USA health rankings (4)
- Vermont (2)
- video (3)
- Virginia (1)
- waivers (16)
- War On Women (2)
- Washington D.C. (11)
- WH deception (6)
- WH propaganda (3)
- WHite House Deception (31)
- White House propaganda (27)
- Women's Health (6)
Archive
D4PC provides links to other Internet sites only for the convenience of web users. D4PC is not responsible for the availability or content of these external sites, nor does the D4PC endorse, warrant or guarantee the products, services or information described or offered at these other Internet sites.